<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Go Green Stay Green&#187; Sam’s Club First U.S. Retailer to Install On-Site Micro-Wind Farm – Walmart is Next | Go Green Stay Green</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gogreenstaygreen.com/category/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gogreenstaygreen.com</link>
	<description>Profitable is Sustainable</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 22:27:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sam’s Club First U.S. Retailer to Install On-Site Micro-Wind Farm – Walmart is Next</title>
		<link>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/sam%e2%80%99s-club-first-u-s-retailer-to-install-on-site-micro-wind-farm-%e2%80%93-walmart-is-next/</link>
		<comments>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/sam%e2%80%99s-club-first-u-s-retailer-to-install-on-site-micro-wind-farm-%e2%80%93-walmart-is-next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 04:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sams club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gogreenstaygreen.com/?p=206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Retailers Sam’s Club and parent company Walmart (NYSE:WMT), are adding wind energy to help power two stores in the United States.
Sam’s Club
17 micro-wind turbines were recently installed at the Sam’s Club store in sunny Palmdale, California. The Skystream turbines, from Massachusetts-based DeerPath Energy Inc., are expected to generate about 76,000 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of energy annually or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-207" title="sams-club-wind-power" src="http://gogreenstaygreen.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/sams-club-wind-power.jpg" alt="Sam's Club Wind Power" width="604" height="454" />Retailers Sam’s Club and parent company Walmart (<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:WMT" target="_blank">NYSE:WMT</a>), are adding wind energy to help power two stores in the United States.</p>
<p><strong>Sam’s Club</strong></p>
<p>17 micro-wind turbines were recently installed at the <a href="http://www.samsclub.com/shopping/index.jsp" target="_blank">Sam’s Club </a>store in sunny Palmdale, California. The Skystream turbines, from Massachusetts-based <a href="http://www.deerpathenergy.com/" target="_blank">DeerPath Energy Inc</a>., are expected to generate about 76,000 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of energy annually or up to 5 percent of the store’s energy needs.</p>
<p>Taking advantage of the windy location, the turbines sit atop the 48-foot-tall streetlamps located in the store’s parking lot.</p>
<div><!-- ca-pub-9716840633437326/EnergyBoom_Wind_ATF_inline_250x250 --><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
GA_googleFillSlot("EnergyBoom_Wind_ATF_inline_250x250")
// ]]&gt;</script><script src="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ads?correlator=1275885876954&amp;output=json_html&amp;callback=GA_googleSetAdContentsBySlotForSync&amp;impl=s&amp;eid=31865001&amp;client=ca-pub-9716840633437326&amp;slotname=EnergyBoom_Wind_ATF_inline_250x250&amp;page_slots=EnergyBoom_Wind_ATF_inline_250x250&amp;cookie_enabled=1&amp;ga_vid=235324551.1275885877&amp;ga_sid=1275885877&amp;ga_hid=169650726&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.energyboom.com%2Fwind%2Fsam%25E2%2580%2599s-club-first-us-retailer-install-site-micro-wind-farm-%25E2%2580%2593-walmart-next&amp;ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stumbleupon.com%2Frefer.php%3Furl%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.energyboom.com%252Fwind%252Fsam%2525E2%252580%252599s-club-first-us-retailer-install-site-micro-wind-farm-%2525E2%252580%252593-walmart-next&amp;lmt=1275885867&amp;dt=1275885876964&amp;cc=100&amp;biw=1680&amp;bih=884&amp;ifi=1&amp;u_tz=480&amp;u_his=11&amp;u_java=true&amp;u_h=1050&amp;u_w=1680&amp;u_ah=1020&amp;u_aw=1680&amp;u_cd=32&amp;u_nplug=24&amp;u_nmime=123&amp;flash=10.0.45"></script><br />
 </p>
<div id="google_ads_div_EnergyBoom_Wind_ATF_inline_250x250"><ins><ins></ins></ins></div>
<p><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
GA_googleCreateDomIframe('google_ads_div_EnergyBoom_Wind_ATF_inline_250x250' ,'EnergyBoom_Wind_ATF_inline_250x250');
// ]]&gt;</script></p>
</div>
<p>According to the company <a href="http://www3.samsclub.com/NewsRoom/Press/688" target="_blank">press release</a>, the installation marks the first time a U.S. retailer has installed a major number of small wind turbines on parking lot light poles to help support the energy needs of the store.</p>
<p>This is not the first green effort by Sam’s Club. In 2008, nine stores in California were converted to include Home Efficient Centers, showcasing energy efficient products for homes and businesses.</p>
<p>The green products, such as outdoor solar lighting, high-efficiency toilets, water-saving showerheads, CFL bulbs and LED lighting, proved so successful, they were rolled out to all nationwide Sam’s Club stores last year.</p>
<p>Sam’s Club, serving more than 47 million members, is the ninth largest retailer in the U.S.</p>
<p><strong>Walmart </strong></p>
<p>Similar micro-wind turbines will also be installed at a new Walmart store in Worcester, Massachusetts. Completion of this project is expected in early May. Other store locations are also being considered as well. Besides lowering operational costs which are then passed down to customers, wind turbines do not create pollution or greenhouse gas emissions.</p>
<p>The wind turbines are part of the company’s commitment to be completely powered by renewable energy.  28 solar systems and several fuel cell installations are located at various Sam’s and Walmart locations in California.</p>
<p>Other green goals by the retail giant include creating zero waste and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. In 2006, the superstore’s goal was to sell 100 million compact fluorescent bulbs in just 12 months. Despite costing more than traditional incandescent bulbs, Walmart sold 137 million CFLs in just one year.</p>
<p>In 2009, the store announced an initiative to track the life cycle of the products it sold.  The project measured water use, greenhouse gas emissions, and fair labor practices.</p>
<p>An electronic recycling and trade-in program, more organic food and apparel choices, and a goal to reduce packaging by 5 percent globally by 2013 are also part of the company’s sustainable efforts</p>
<p>Touted as the world’s greenest retailer, Walmart employs over 2 million employees worldwide. Earlier this year, the retail giant was named one of the <a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/mic/2010/profile/walmart" target="_blank">World’s Most Innovative Companies of 2010 </a>by Fast Company Magazine.</p>
<p><em>Photo courtesy of Sam&#8217;s Club.</em></p>
<p>Learn more about Wind Power on eBoom&#8217;s <a href="http://www.energyboom.com/wind/learn">Wind Energy Learning </a>Page.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.energyboom.com/wind/sam%E2%80%99s-club-first-us-retailer-install-site-micro-wind-farm-%E2%80%93-walmart-next" target="_blank">Energy Boom Wind</a> by Jace Shoemaker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/sam%e2%80%99s-club-first-u-s-retailer-to-install-on-site-micro-wind-farm-%e2%80%93-walmart-is-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tesla &amp; Toyota: A New Partnership</title>
		<link>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/tesla-toyota-a-new-partnership/</link>
		<comments>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/tesla-toyota-a-new-partnership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 09:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tesla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gogreenstaygreen.com/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Toyota recently invested $50 million in Tesla Motors, the electric sports car company. The money will go toward buying an auto plant in Freemont, California. There, they plan to produce 20,000 electric vehicles per year.
The cars produced at the plant will by Toyota cars, utilizing Tesla&#8217;s technology in electric drive trains. The first cars will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gogreenstaygreen.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/tesla-model-s.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-196" title="tesla-model-s" src="http://gogreenstaygreen.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/tesla-model-s.jpg" alt="Tesla Toyota Partnership" width="500" height="388" /></a>Toyota recently invested $50 million in Tesla Motors, the electric sports car company. The money will go toward buying an auto plant in Freemont, California. There, they plan to produce 20,000 electric vehicles per year.</p>
<p>The cars produced at the plant will by Toyota cars, utilizing Tesla&#8217;s technology in electric drive trains. The first cars will be coming off the line in 2012, and will cost about $50K. The first car (pictured here) will be the Model S sedan.</p>
<p>via: <a href="http://solarpowerbuzz.blogspot.com/2010/05/toyota-coporation-partners-with-tesla.html" target="_blank">Solar Power Buzz</a></p>
<p>image thanks to <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson/" target="_blank">jurvetson</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/tesla-toyota-a-new-partnership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GM To Invest $893M to Produce New Generation of Fuel Efficient Small Block Truck and Car Engines</title>
		<link>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/gm-invest-893m-produce-new-generation-fuel-efficient-small-block-truck-car-engines/</link>
		<comments>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/gm-invest-893m-produce-new-generation-fuel-efficient-small-block-truck-car-engines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 03:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trucks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gogreenstaygreen.com/?p=169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[General Motors will invest $893 million to produce a new generation of small block truck and car engines which will offer improved fuel efficiency through direct injection and an all-new advanced combustion system design.
The new engine family will rely exclusively on aluminum engine blocks, which are lighter and contribute to the improved fuel efficiency. In [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-170" title="GM" src="http://gogreenstaygreen.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/GM.jpg" alt="GM" width="119" height="119" />General Motors will <a href="http://www.greencarcongress.com/2010/04/he%20next%20generation%20small%20block%20engine%20family%20will%20have%20unprecedented%20fuel%20efficiency%20through%20direct%20injection%20and%20an%20all-new%20advanced%20combustion%20system%20design.%20The%20new%20engine%20family%20will%20rely%20exclusively%20on%20aluminum%20engine%20blocks,%20which%20are%20lighter%20and%20contribute%20to%20the%20improved%20fuel%20efficiency.%20In%20addition%20to%20being%20E85%20ethanol%20capable,%20these%20engines%20are%20being%20designed%20with%20the%20capability%20to%20meet%20increasingly%20stringent%20criteria%20emissions%20standards%20expected%20throughout%20this%20decade.">invest</a> $893 million to produce a new generation of small block truck and car engines which will offer improved fuel efficiency through direct injection and an all-new advanced combustion system design.</p>
<p>The new engine family will rely exclusively on aluminum engine blocks, which are lighter and contribute to the improved fuel efficiency. In addition to being E85 ethanol capable, these engines are being designed with the capability to meet increasingly stringent criteria emissions standards expected throughout this decade. GM said that specifics about the engine capabilities as well as product applications will be shared at a later date.</p>
<p><!--<a id="more"></a>&#8211;>The new investment will be spread across five plants to support the new engines. Two plants will support the engine production, and three plants will support engine casting and component production. The investment consists of the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>Production: Tonawanda, NY, $400 million</li>
<li>Production: St. Catharines, Ontario, $235 million</li>
<li>Casting and components: Defiance, OH, $115 million</li>
<li>Casting and components: Bedford, IN, $111 million</li>
<li>Bay City, MI, $32 million</li>
</ul>
<p>The investments include facility renovation and installation of new, highly flexible engine machining and assembly equipment and special tooling designed for manufacturing efficiency and engine quality. At the casting facilities, investments include expansion of semi-permanent mold and precision sand casting technologies that result in a high degree of dimensional accuracy and material strength properties needed to support the newer, more efficient engines in GM’s product portfolio.</p>
<p>Since the launch of the new GM last July, the company has announced investments of more than $2.3 billion at 22 facilities in the US and Canada.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.greencarcongress.com/2010/04/gm-engines-20100427.html#more" target="_blank">Green Car Congress</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/gm-invest-893m-produce-new-generation-fuel-efficient-small-block-truck-car-engines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spud Giant Closes Loop on Sustainability</title>
		<link>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/spud-giant-closes-loop-on-sustainability/</link>
		<comments>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/spud-giant-closes-loop-on-sustainability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gogreenstaygreen.com/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J.R. Simplot, the nation’s largest potato grower and provider of McDonald’s french fries, has created an internal value-chain loop out of its sustainability practices.
Simplot, which has about $4.5 billion in annual sales, takes waste slurry from its phosphate mining operations and pipes it 87 miles underground to a plant where it’s converted to fertilizer this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-165" title="spud-giant-closes-loop-sustainability" src="http://gogreenstaygreen.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/spud-giant-closes-loop-sustainability.jpeg" alt="spud giant closes loop on sustainability" width="200" height="126" />J.R. Simplot, the nation’s largest potato grower and provider of McDonald’s french fries, has created an internal value-chain loop out of its sustainability practices.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.simplot.com/">Simplot</a>, which has about $4.5 billion in annual sales, takes waste slurry from its phosphate mining operations and pipes it 87 miles underground to a plant where it’s converted to fertilizer this is used in potato-growing operations, according to the firm’s <a href="http://www.simplot.com/company/sustainability.cfm">sustainability report</a>.</p>
<p>By-products from the firm’s food processing and fertilizer plants are used to provide water and nutrients to neighboring farms via “land application” that is tailored to meet the needs of the specific crop being grown.</p>
<p>By-products from potato processing plants are fed into anaerobic digesters to capture biogas, which is used in boiler systems at Simplot’s plants in Aberdeen, Moses Lake and Portate La Prairie.</p>
<p>The Moses Lake facility alone is able to reduce its annual emissions 15,000 tons a year because of this process.</p>
<p>In 2008, Simplot began using oil from its french fry facilities to create biodiesel that is used in its transportation and mining equipment. The project has created more than 100,000 gallons of biodiesel.</p>
<p>With regard to reducing emissions, Simplot installed a wet electrostatic precipator in its Nampa pototo processing plant, as well as others.</p>
<p>Simplot, which also operates the nation’s largest cattle feedlots, has come under fire in recent years for its environmental practices. In fact, in 2008 Conde Naste Portfolio called Simplot <a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/02/26/jr-simplot-tops-portfolios-list-of-polluters/">the nation’s “worst polluter</a>.”</p>
<p>Earlier this year, two of Simplot’s plants were among the <a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2010/01/20/simplot-conagra-earn-energy-star-for-food-processing/">first food processing plants in the nation to be Energy Star rated</a>.</p>
<p>Simplot produces 3 billion pounds of frozen french fries a year and sells more than 1,000 food products.</p>
<p>Its cattle herd numbers 30,000.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2010/04/23/spud-giant-closes-loop-on-sustainability/" target="_blank">Environmental Leader</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/spud-giant-closes-loop-on-sustainability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>False Solar Panel Advertising</title>
		<link>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/false-solar-panel-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/false-solar-panel-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gogreenstaygreen.com/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SRS Energy, who have developed a so-called &#8220;residential solution&#8221; for United Solar (see page 28 of the Investor day presentation), is in full-force marketing offensive.  Last week they used a hapless &#8220;journalist&#8221; to plant a CNET story [cached] containing several false and misleading statements.
The article starts with the picture above and the credit reads [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="post-body entry-content"><a href="http://www.srsenergy.com/"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-128" title="srs energy" src="http://gogreenstaygreen.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/srs-energy.jpg" alt="fake solar advertising" width="450" height="450" />SRS Energy</a>, who have developed a so-called &#8220;residential solution&#8221; for United Solar (see page 28 of the <a href="http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/ENER/668119452x0x239213/1c59ee68-d936-40d0-a8e1-dd7d3a21d8b5/PrintableSlides.pdf">Investor day presentation</a>), is in full-force marketing offensive.  Last week they used a hapless &#8220;journalist&#8221; to plant a <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-10268814-54.htm">CNET story</a> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">[</span><a href="http://sqrl.it/?6cofl"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">cached</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">]</span> containing several false and misleading statements.</p>
<p>The article starts with the picture above and the credit reads &#8220;<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #3366ff;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;">Solé Power Tile system developed for US Tile by SRS Energy integrates seamlessly with its terra-cotta counterparts<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #000000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #3366ff;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;">.</span></span>&#8221;  Presumably, the dark-blueish tiles are &#8220;<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #3366ff;">solar tiles that offer style</span>&#8221; (at least that&#8217;s what the title of the article implies).  <strong>That picture is fake</strong>, of course.  A total fabrication.  No tile on that roof generates any electricity!  All the blue tiles are <strong>actually red clay tiles</strong> in real life (the picture is simply digitally altered in some image-editing software). The picture on the left shows how the actual roof looks like (from a <a href="http://www.ustile.com/brochures/USTileBrochureNewLogo.pdf">brochure of US Tile</a>).  If that is not convincing enough,</span></span></span><br />
a <a href="http://www.srsenergy.com/Libraries/Gallery/Gallery_Photo_01.sflb.ashx">partially altered picture</a> can be found on SRS Energy&#8217;s web site and in another <a href="https://www.iterasi.net/Viewer.aspx?RootAssetID=2661045">article</a> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">[</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://sqrl.it/?c8rrm">cached</a></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">] </span>- the vegetation in all these pictures looks exactly the same, which excludes the possibility that the building was reroofed with the blue tiles at some point. It is all one and the same picture, only the roof has been digitally &#8220;painted.&#8221; If you have the patience, you can spot the differences and similarities <a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_I1XWYORAPtU/SkA1zb9wuMI/AAAAAAAAAIQ/fHrsrd50koE/s400/Gallery%2BPhoto%2B01_photoshop.JPG">here</a>.</p>
<p>But these are not all the <strong>fake pictures</strong> SRS Energy can offer<strong>. </strong>Look at the image on the company&#8217;s <a href="http://www.srsenergy.com/">home page</a> , which can also be found in their &#8220;<a href="http://www.srsenergy.com/Libraries/Architects/Sell_Sheet.sflb.ashx">sell sheet</a>,&#8221; and in this <a href="http://www.gabreport.com/gabreport/2009/05/simplify-solar-with-the-first-curved-solar-roofing-tile.html">story</a> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">[</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://sqrl.it/?o2q1x">cached</a></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">]</span>.  <strong>A fake</strong>, of course. The actual roof is done entirely with red ceramic tiles. Here are the actual and &#8220;remastered&#8221; pictures side by side:<br />
<img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5350337612949652258" style="margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_I1XWYORAPtU/SkA3tjBGgyI/AAAAAAAAAIY/o67AuWxSpfc/s200/ustile_actual_small.JPG" border="0" alt="real picture of tiles" align="left" /><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5350339259674222914" style="float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_I1XWYORAPtU/SkA5NZi1YUI/AAAAAAAAAIg/hNnMIFGTi9U/s200/fake2.jpg" border="0" alt="fake go green ad" align="left" /><br />
You can find the actual picture on US Tile&#8217;s <a href="http://www.ustile.com/">web site</a>, by clicking on &#8220;<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #3366ff;">Why US Tile</span>,&#8221; and then on &#8220;<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #3366ff;">see Faux Mission</span>.&#8221;</p>
<p>The deception and misinformation do not end with fake pictures. Here are some of the statements made in the story by SRS Energy&#8217;s Marketing Director, <a href="http://sqrl.it/?xncdr">who claims</a> to &#8220;work for the greater good.&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #3366ff;">Cell efficiency for the tiles is between 8 percent and 10 percent.</span>&#8221; That, of course, is an outright lie (except maybe for a few hours of light exposure &#8211; Unisolar laminate degrade rapidly in the first hours and weeks under the sun until they settle to their rated efficiency).</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div>The stabilized cell efficiency of the PV laminate material is lower. As<a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=r2Zz7V5nNvUIcNfeeiHsLKw&amp;single=true&amp;gid=0&amp;output=html">this spreadsheet</a> shows, Unisolar&#8217;s best &#8220;stated&#8221; cell efficiency is 8.5%, but the tile system from SRS Energy won&#8217;t use those cells. According to their documentation, the <a href="http://www.srsenergy.com/Libraries/Architects/CAD_Drawing_PDF.sflb.ashx">3-cell tile</a> is <a href="http://www.srsenergy.com/Libraries/Architects/Spec.sflb.ashx">17 Watts</a>, and as each Unisolar cell is 0.239 meter x 0.356 meter, it means the effective cell efficiency is 6.7%, which corresponds to 7.5% &#8220;stated&#8221;  cell efficiency (the same cell used in Unisolar&#8217;s <a href="http://ecdfan.blogspot.com/2009/06/unisolar-efficiencies-mystery-of-pvl.html">latest laminate</a>, PVL-128).  However, to make things worse, the <a href="http://www.srsenergy.com/Libraries/Architects/Sell_Sheet.sflb.ashx">documentation</a> states that 30 interlocking tiles cover 100 sq ft, and since each panel is 17 W, that means 510 Watts per 100 sq ft. (actually, <a href="http://sqrl.it/?e9fi2">this</a> and <a href="http://sqrl.it/?hadbd">this</a> stories claim the tiles are only rated 500 watts per sq ft). Using the 510 number and dividing by the area in square meters, the calculated &#8220;panel&#8221;-level efficiency is just 5.5% (30 * 17 W / 9.29030 sq m / 1000). Even the PVL-128 laminate (made with 22 cells) has a slightly higher, 5.9%, panel-level efficiency.</p>
<li> &#8220;<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #3366ff;">That [cell efficiency] puts it slightly below what others in thin-film photovoltaics have been getting</span>.&#8221;  Not true.  First Solar&#8217;s panel-level efficiency is at least <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=rN3EmdvOo2Lw5bs_fSJ-XxA&amp;hl=en">10.4%</a>, thus the solar tile efficiency is not just slightly below, but <strong>47% below </strong>that of First Solar&#8217;s thin-film modules.  This is one of the reasons why First Solar sales are increasing, while <a href="http://ecdfan.blogspot.com/2009/05/unisolar-dilemma-not-selling-or-selling_27.html">Unisolar sales are declining</a>.</li>
<li>&#8220;<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #3366ff;">SRS Energy system&#8217;s overall efficiency makes up for the difference in sunlight to electricity conversion figures. &#8216;If a homeowner bought 4kW of crystalline silicon panels and then 4KW of the Solé US Tiles, they will get 10 to 15 percent more output in terms of a KWh (kilowatt hour) on their electricity&#8217;</span>&#8221; The &#8220;make-up&#8221; statement is a red herring, of course &#8211; a 4KW solar tile system will occupy 3.5x the area of a 4KW crystalline SunPower system. The &#8220;10-15% more kWh/kW&#8221; statement is false as well, including the concocted explanations of panels waking up earlier, or better absorbing the light spectrum, etc. Several documented real-world performance records in various climates in the US and Europe demonstrate that the alleged kWh/kW advantage is a myth (<a href="http://ecdfan.blogspot.com/2009/05/kwhkw-myth-part-i.html">I</a>, <a href="http://ecdfan.blogspot.com/2009/05/kwhkw-myth-part-ii.html">II</a>, <a href="http://ecdfan.blogspot.com/2009/05/kwhkw-myth-part-iii.html">III</a>, <a href="http://ecdfan.blogspot.com/2009/05/kwhkw-myth-part-iv.html">IV</a>, <a href="http://ecdfan.blogspot.com/2009/06/thin-film-solar-installation-revisited.html">V</a>, <a href="http://ecdfan.blogspot.com/2009/05/agts-mistake-and-possible-double.html">VI</a>). The advantage, if any, is 5% and below. Thus, &#8220;effective&#8221; panel-level efficiency could potentially rise to only 5.8% (5.5% *1.05). Of course, that 5% advantage will be there only in the first 5-10 years, as the faster degradation of the Unisolar laminates relative to other thin-film and crystalline modules will eliminate it over time (average annual degradation for Unisolar triple-junction laminates has been shown, <a href="http://www1.eere.energy.gov/solar/review_meeting/pdfs/exp_5_osterwald_nrel.pdf">see page 9</a>, to be 1.22%, while crystalline&#8217;s is typically 0.5-0.7%). But that&#8217;s not all. What makes things worse is that the tiles are curved, thus even for a roof that is south-oriented and tilted at optimal angle, the light hits the PV cells at various suboptimal angles. Even a casual simulation analysis with the <a href="http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/codes_algs/PVWATTS/version1/">PVWatts</a> calculator indicates that, in fact, the curvature could result in less energy than a flat panel tilted at zero degrees slope. For <a href="http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/codes_algs/PVWATTS/version1/US/California/San_Diego.html">example</a>, a flat panel, tilted flat (zero degrees), in San Diego is estimated to generate 1314 kWh/kW AC electricity a year. A south-oriented 30-degrees-tilted flat panel generates 1500 KWh/KW, but east-oriented 30-degree-tilted panel generates just 1160 KWH/KW, while a west-oriented 30-degree-tilted one does 1268 KWH/KW (note how the east- and west-oriented tilted panels generate less electricity than a zero-tilt panel). Thus, almost certainly the tiles will underperform crystalline and CdTe panels (which, of course, both have flat surfaces) on the same roof on kWh/kW basis.</li>
<li>&#8220;<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #3366ff;">SRS Energy&#8217;s statistics say the average homeowner with Solé Power Tiles can get 860 kilowatt hours per square foot annually living in an area with &#8216;5.8 peak sun hours&#8217; per day.</span>&#8221; SRS Energy has no such statistics, as they would contradict the real world experience of installations with Unisolar laminates. Actually, <strong>the laws of physics make it </strong><strong>impossible</strong> for a PV solar system to generate 860 kilowatt hours per square foot annually in an area with &#8220;5.8 peak sun hours&#8221; per day. SRS Energy&#8217;s <a href="http://www.srsenergy.com/Libraries/Architects/Sell_Sheet.sflb.ashx">literature</a> makes a more believable claim of 860 kilowatt hours per square (a square is 100 sq ft). But even that claim is deceptive. For the &#8220;860 kWh per square&#8221; claim to be true, the tiles must be generating 1686 kWh/KW AC electricty on an annual basis (as a square has 0.510 kW worth of solar tiles). Luckily, there are few Unisolar installation in San Diego, an area with &#8220;5.8 peak sun hours,&#8221; according to <a href="http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/codes_algs/PVWATTS/version1/US/code/pvwattsv1.cgi">PVWatts</a> (solar radiation hitting south-oriented 30-degree tilted panels), so the claim can be verified. SIT has installed Unisolar-based roofs at 28 schools in the area (installations and performance have been summarized in a <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=rvxsSjR3RglLR3cNnLtKEmg&amp;hl=en">spreadsheet</a>). The median/average performance was below 1470 kWh/kW, or 13% less than what SRS Energy claims. A Unisolar system installed by Sullivan Solar, an installer in the area (see the same spreadsheet) has done a bit better, 1550 kWH/kW (accidentally, just 1% better than the average and median of three crystalline installations nearby). True, these Unisolar installations are on flat roofs, but as explained above, zero-degree tilt &#8220;panels&#8221; would likely outperform the curved solar tiles.</li>
<p>The CNET story ends with a picture of the SRS Energy&#8217; CEO&#8217;s ice-cream parlor (sporting mostly red tiles and a row of the blueish solar tiles), which according to the story is &#8220;<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #3366ff;">the first commercial buildings to implement the Solé Power Tile system</span>.&#8221;  But his store&#8217;s <a href="http://www.zwahlens.com/">home page</a> shows grey shingles and so does <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&amp;q=670+Shannondell+Boulevard,+Audubon,+PA+19403&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;split=0&amp;gl=us&amp;ei=NE9ASuDdJpfKtgep3I2kAQ&amp;ll=40.128298,-75.405634&amp;spn=0.001192,0.002639&amp;t=h&amp;z=19&amp;iwloc=A">Google maps&#8217; satellite image</a>. So, SRS Energy&#8217;s CEO had to waste money and labor to tear down and replace a perfectly nice roof, so that he could install 1KW or so worth of solar? Is that SRS&#8217; idea of <a href="http://www.srsenergy.com/Libraries/Architects/AIA_Press_Release.sflb.ashx">&#8220;eco-nomics</a>?&#8221;. Is that &#8220;the sustainable upgrade [made] a simple one for the homeowner, which means it is also more accessible?&#8221; (see <a href="http://www.poweronline.com/article.mvc/SRS-Energy-Partners-With-US-Tile-To-Offer-0001?VNETCOOKIE=NO">here</a> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">[</span><a href="http://sqrl.it/?3u952"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">cached</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">]</span>).<br />
The CEO <a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/04/20/srs-introduces-thin-film-solar-tile-for-clay-tile-roofs/">stated</a> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">[</span><a href="http://sqrl.it/?2nx8a"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">cached</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">]</span> that “<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #3366ff;">choosing to upgrade to a sustainable roof from SRS Energy puts energy savings in homeowners’ pockets immediately and delivers compelling long-term returns.</span>” That wasn&#8217;t the case with his &#8220;sustainable&#8221; roof, but he is clearly hoping that the showcase will transfer the homeowners&#8217; savings into his pockets, and, hopefully, deliver some return on the <a href="http://philadelphia.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/stories/2007/08/13/story1.html">millions</a> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">[</span><a href="http://sqrl.it/?hzfqs"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">cached</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">]</span> put in his venture by &#8220;angel&#8221; investors.</p>
<p>Before analyzing the prospects of a success for this product, let&#8217;s explore some more &#8220;marketing messages&#8221; scattered across product documentation and planted articles:</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #3366ff;">SRS Energy materials are UL recognized as trusted and safe solar roofing components.</span>&#8221; (source: <a href="http://www.srsenergy.com/Libraries/Architects/Sell_Sheet.sflb.ashx">here</a>).  Possibly, but why is the “UL Recognized&#8221;  <a href="http://database.ul.com/grcinterfro_00-1-frnt.pdf">logo</a> missing from the &#8220;sell&#8221; sheet?  The solar tile is obviously <a href="http://database.ul.com/cgi-bin/XYV/template/LISEXT/1FRAME/index.html"><strong>not UL certified</strong></a>, and using UL recognized materials means little for an electrical device. Here is an example: copper wire is UL certified, but soldering it to short the solar tile electric connector will lead to overheating and even fire under the sun. Will these tiles ever pass any UL or IEC certification? Note that Unisolar laminates&#8217; IEC 61730 certification <a href="http://ecdfan.blogspot.com/2009/06/certification-of-safety.html">may still be &#8220;pending,&#8221;</a> and the original Unisolar &#8220;residential product&#8221;, the <a href="http://www.uni-solar.com/uploadedFiles/0.4.1_shingle_sell_sheet_10-7-04_high_res.pdf">SHR-17</a> solar shingles (now taken off the market), no longer carry the UL certification and were shown to degrade in likely violation of their warranty (and then Unisolar simply stopped disclosing degradation data).</li>
<li>&#8220;<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #3366ff;">Solé Power Tile &#8230; bringing the first building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) roofing product to <strong>curved</strong> roofing systems.</span>&#8221; (sources:  <a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/04/20/srs-introduces-thin-film-solar-tile-for-clay-tile-roofs/">here</a> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">[</span><a href="http://sqrl.it/?02xgy"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">cached</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">]</span> and <a href="http://www.gabreport.com/gabreport/2009/05/simplify-solar-with-the-first-curved-solar-roofing-tile.html">here</a> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">[</span><a href="http://sqrl.it/?utqly"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">cached</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">]</span>) .  This is <em>patently</em> false, of course, as SRS Energy&#8217;s <a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;p=1&amp;u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;co1=AND&amp;d=PG01&amp;s1=20080302409&amp;OS=20080302409&amp;RS=20080302409">patent application</a>, as well as the <a href="http://www.srsenergy.com/Libraries/Architects/CAD_Drawing_PDF.sflb.ashx">CAD drawing</a> indicate that the tiles have to be nailed to straight, not curved, underlayment given their interlocking design.</li>
<li>Chart titled &#8220;<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #3366ff;">They wake up earlier and stay up later</span>&#8221; and footnoted &#8220;<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #3366ff;">Amorphous silicon thin-film technology incorporated within the Solé Power Tile allows the system to produce an estimated 8-20% more energy than incumbent crystalline silicon panels</span>&#8221; (source: <a href="http://www.srsenergy.com/Libraries/Architects/Performance_and_Savings.sflb.ashx">here</a>).</li>
</ul>
<p>Look at the Y-axis label on the left. It is in kWh. What this chart claims, then, is that by 1 pm, &#8220;conventional&#8221; glass modules have generated 400 Wh while the tiles have generated only 350 Wh worth of electrical energy. In the afternoon, all this generated electrical energy is consumed, bringing net PV generation for the day to zero (for both the conventional panels and the tiles). Of course, the label is wrong. It should be &#8220;kW&#8221; not &#8220;kWh.&#8221; One is a measure for power, the other, for energy. But these are probably minor details for SRS Energy and their <a href="http://www.ustile.com/">clay tile partner</a>. Unfortunately, even if the axis were labeled &#8220;kW,&#8221; that pricture would contradict SRS Energy&#8217;s message that the Unisolar&#8217;s panels somehow do not &#8220;<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-10268814-54.htm">degrade in performance as they get hotter</a>&#8221; <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">[</span><a href="http://sqrl.it/?6cofl"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">cached</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">]</span>. Around 1pm, a time not known for the lowest temperature during the day, conventional panels, according to this chart, outperform the solar tiles!</p>
<ul>
<li> The rest of the <a href="http://www.srsenergy.com/Libraries/Architects/Performance_and_Savings.sflb.ashx">Performance and Savings</a> sheet is all wrong, as well.   A 4KW tile system in a &#8220;5.5 hour day&#8221; area (<a href="http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/codes_algs/PVWATTS/version1/US/California/San_Francisco.html">San Francisco</a> or Santa Cruz) will not generate 6,022 KWh on an annual basis. Even an optimally (30 degrees) tilted and well-ventilated Unisolar laminate generates only <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=ruID3OZYrIizJZ79JLREefg&amp;hl=en">1500-1650 kWh/kW in Santa Cruz</a>.  A zero-degree-tilted flat laminate makes 1275 kWh/kW, on average.  As discussed already, even optimally tilted <em>curved</em> tiles will likely generate much less than optimally tilted flat panels. Thus, the most SRS Energy can hope for is 1500 kWh/kW for their tiles. That comes to 6,000 kWh for a 4KW system, which is well below the 6,800 kWh in their &#8220;illustration.&#8221; The crystalline number of 6,022 kWh in the &#8220;example&#8221; is more plausible, by the way. Finally, the term &#8220;Efficiency&#8221; (see the third term in the calculation illustration) conventionally applies to conversion efficiency, not performance ratio.</li>
<li>&#8220;<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #3366ff;">The Solé Power Tile™ energy advantage allows the system to deliver more savings in the form of a reduced or eliminated electricity bill and creates value with increased homeowner equity</span>&#8221; (source:  the <span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #000000;"><a href="http://www.srsenergy.com/Libraries/Architects/Performance_and_Savings.sflb.ashx">Performance and Savings</a></span> sheet).  To illustrate that bold statement,   SRS Energy attaches an electrical bill that indicates 376 kWh electrical energy <em>usage. </em> In fact,  the bill shows that electricty consumption increased from <strong>176 kWh</strong> in the period 2/14/2009-2/28/2009 to <strong>200 kWh</strong> in the periof 3/1/2009-3/17/2009. This surely does not look like a house with a solar system installed. It is even more weird that SRS Energy has decided to &#8220;magnify&#8221; that 376 kWh <strong>energy usage</strong> and label it <strong><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">379 kWh</span></strong>. A Freudian slip, no doubt. The energy bill did not get reduced. It increased! The hapless homeowner will actually experience a destruction of value &#8211; more on that below.</li>
</ul>
<p>So, setting aside the marketing propaganda, does this new product make any sense?  The answer appears to be <strong>no</strong>:</p>
<ol>
<li>Just two <a href="http://us.sunpowercorp.com/downloads/product_pdfs/business/SunPower_315ewh_com_en.pdf">SunPower SP-315</a> panels (61 inch x 41 inch each, covering a combined area of 17.6 sq ft) deliver 24% more power under STC than 30 solar tiles (covering 100 sq ft). Two SunPower panels can be installed in minutes, laying 30 tiles and carefully connecting them to the underlayment circuitry may take hours. No wonder SunPower has 20%+ share in the California rooftop PV market (the first <a href="http://www.gabreport.com/gabreport/2009/05/simplify-solar-with-the-first-curved-solar-roofing-tile.html">intended market</a> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">[</span><a href="http://sqrl.it/?4orl7"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">cached</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">]</span> for the tiles), while Unisolar&#8217;s share there is 0.1%, <a href="http://ecdfan.blogspot.com/2009/05/csi-snapshot-as-of-april-29th-2009.html">according to the CSI</a>.</li>
<li>Cost will be prohibitive, even after <a href="http://www.seia.org/galleries/pdf/ITC_Frequently_Asked_Questions_10_9_08.pdf">ITC</a>.  The tiles need to sell for $6 or more per Watt for SRS Energy to break even (initial plans were for  <a href="http://philadelphia.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/stories/2007/08/13/story1.html">$8 per Watt</a> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">[</span><a href="http://sqrl.it/?t36ko"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">cached</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">]</span>).  Unfortunately, thin-film solar panels can be found for less than <a href="http://ecdfan.blogspot.com/2009/05/unisolar-dilemma-not-selling-or-selling_27.html">$2 per Watt</a> on the market these days, and all the tiles will save in terms of equipment or materials is a rack (which is only anywhere between 60c to 10c per Watt, depending on the installation size).</li>
<li>The solar tiles will not be viewed as a roofing material.  Clay tiles can be purchased for <a href="http://roofing.builddirect.com/Clay-Tile-Roofing.aspx">$200 per square</a> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">[</span><a href="http://sqrl.it/?h50gp"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">cached</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">]</span>. At $6 per Watt, the solar tiles will cost $3,000+ per square ($6 x 510W), or 15x as much. Their color is attrocious, and they are made of plastic (<a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;p=1&amp;u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;co1=AND&amp;d=PG01&amp;s1=20080302409&amp;OS=20080302409&amp;RS=20080302409">polypropylene</a>). There are reasons why people generally don&#8217;t put plastic tiles on their roofs that are supposed to last at least 20 years (cost, discoloration, delamination, degradation from UV radiation over time, and <a href="http://www.seamannewsroom.com/ftnews/vol1issue2/">fire hazards</a> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">[</span><a href="http://sqrl.it/?fk8sd"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">cached</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">]</span> come to mind). The weird rare color makes things worse &#8211; a thoughtful homeowner would wonder who will provide the dark blueish tiles in 5-6 years if breakage or loss occurs, if the <em>sole</em> manufacture of the Solé tiles has (god forbid) discontinued the product (the owners of the Unisolar&#8217;s SHR-17 shingles are currently in that pickle).</li>
<li>Going PV with solar tiles rather than regular solar panels will be viewed as a risky proposition by the customer, given that 99.9% of the PV market in California is flat glass panels, even ignoring the <a href="http://ecdfan.blogspot.com/2009/06/certification-of-safety.html">lack of certifications</a> or <a href="http://ecdfan.blogspot.com/2009/06/unisolar-eligible-for-incentives-in-ca.html">ineligibility for state incentives</a>.    Jumping on the tile bandwagon won&#8217;t be an &#8220;<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #3366ff;">incremental <span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #000000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #3366ff;">rather than monumental</span>&#8221; decision SRS Energy <a href="http://www.gabreport.com/gabreport/2009/05/simplify-solar-with-the-first-curved-solar-roofing-tile.html">wants us to believe</a> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">[</span><a href="http://sqrl.it/?gr8tw"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">cached</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">]</span>.  Quite the opposite.  Of course,  SRS Energy could easily &#8220;<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #3366ff;">absorb the headaches and paperwork surrounding solar incentive programs</span>&#8221; &#8211; there simply won&#8217;t be any state incentives in California for this product.</span></span></li>
<li>Plastic is not a truly &#8220;<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #3366ff;">sustainable</span>&#8221; material (as it is made from hydrocarbons) and it is not a clean way for homeowners to go &#8220;<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #3366ff;">green</span>&#8220;, despite SRS Energy&#8217;s <a href="http://www.poweronline.com/article.mvc/SRS-Energy-Partners-With-US-Tile-To-Offer-0001?VNETCOOKIE=NO">claims</a> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">[</span><a href="http://sqrl.it/?6rxr3"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">cached</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">]</span> to the contrary.  The solar tiles may not be a truly LEED product either, despite SRS Energy&#8217;s <a href="http://www.srsenergy.com/Libraries/Architects/LEED.sflb.ashx">claims</a> &#8211; unlike ceramic tiles which absorb moisture at night, and thus cool the roof during the day, plastic does not absorb water.</li>
</ol>
<p><a href="http://investor.shareholder.com/ovonics/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=338088">CertainTeed</a>, arguably the country&#8217;s third-largest roofing company, <a href="http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/philadelphia-based-srs-energy-to-introduce,852981.shtml">acquired</a> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">[</span><a href="http://sqrl.it/?5ymo1"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">cached</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">]</span> an equity stake in SRS Energy in 2008.   What were they thinking?</p>
</div>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.solarfeeds.com/the-truth-about-ecd/7649-the-marketing-of-a-solar-tile.html" target="_blank">The Marketing of a Solar Tile by Solar Feeds </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/false-solar-panel-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York City’s First Net Metered Commercial Solar Array is America’s Biggest</title>
		<link>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/new-york-city-first-net-metered-commercial-solar-array-americas-biggest/</link>
		<comments>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/new-york-city-first-net-metered-commercial-solar-array-americas-biggest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gogreenstaygreen.com/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last August, Governor Paterson signed a series of bills to allow commercial net metering installations across New York State. Previously, only residential users were allowed to generate their own electricity from renewable sources and sell it back into the grid. The first such commercial installation in New York City was recently commissioned at 925 Bergen [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gogreenstaygreen.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/commercial-solar-array.gif"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-59" title="commercial-solar-array" src="http://gogreenstaygreen.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/commercial-solar-array.gif" alt="new york biggest solar array" width="293" height="220" /></a>Last August, Governor Paterson signed a series of bills to allow commercial net metering installations across New York State. Previously, only residential users were allowed to generate their own electricity from renewable sources and sell it back into the grid. The first such commercial installation in New York City was recently commissioned at <strong>925 Bergen Street</strong> in Brooklyn by solar power installer <strong>Solar Energy Systems</strong> (SES) for <strong>Big Sue LLC</strong>, a general contracting and consulting firm that specializes in green design-build projects, which owns and operates the property. The installation is a 40 kilowatt solar array and, according to SES, is the largest commercial net-metered photovoltaic system in the entire country. According to Big Sue co-owner <strong>Susan Boyle</strong>, the company investigated a number of alternative power sources for 925 Bergen before opting for the solar array because of “the simplicity afforded by net metering.”</p>
<p>50,000-square-foot 925 Bergen Street dates from the 1880s and was formerly known as the Budweiser (later Nassau) Brewery. It currently offers 25 commercial units for lease that range in size from 500 to 4500 square feet. In addition to the <a href="http://www.getsolar.com/">solar installation</a> , the building includes a variety of green retrofits ranging from radiant heating, low-VOC paints and sealants, salvaged lighting and water fixtures, and locally-sourced materials to a 4000-square-foot green roof. In 2004, Big Sue completed a green renovation of <strong>1024 Dean Street</strong> &#8211; which once served as the ice house for the Nassau Brewery at 925 Bergen &#8211; into six residential units and received a number of green building awards in doing so from both the Brooklyn Chamber of Commerce and the New York City Green Building Design Competition.</p>
<p>The applicable legislation, which was enacted as <strong>Senate Bill 7171</strong>, allows net metering for commercial systems up to 2 megawatts in capacity. It also increases the maximum system size for residential installations from 10 to 25 kilowatts. In addition, for building owners that install solar power systems, <strong>Senate Bill 8145</strong> (which applies only to New York City) allows for a four-year real property tax abatement of up to $62,500.00 per year.</p>
<hr />Source: <a href="http://www.greenbuildingsnyc.com/2009/01/22/net-metered-commercial-solar-array-biggest-in-america/">GreenBuildings NYC</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/new-york-city-first-net-metered-commercial-solar-array-americas-biggest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reading Between the Lines on Obama’s Inauguration Speech: What Does It Mean for the Green Economy?</title>
		<link>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/reading-between-lines-obama-inauguration-speech-green-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/reading-between-lines-obama-inauguration-speech-green-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gogreenstaygreen.com/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
George W. Bush sat just a few feet behind Barack Obama during the new President’s Inauguration address, delivered on a frigid yet sunny Washington, D.C. day.  The former President appeared warmly dressed but must have felt a distinct chill in the stern repudiation he was publicly receiving, however eloquently Mr. Obama delivered it.  CNN’s camera [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<h3>George W. Bush sat just a few feet behind Barack Obama during the new President’s Inauguration address, delivered on a frigid yet sunny Washington, D.C. day.  The former President appeared warmly dressed but must have felt a distinct chill in the stern repudiation he was publicly receiving, however eloquently Mr. Obama delivered it.  CNN’s camera showed Bush, wearing his best poker face, flinch ever so slightly when Mr. Obama suggested, “We will restore science to its rightful place.”</h3>
<p><a href="http://ecopreneurist.com/files/2009/01/obama.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-64" title="obama" src="http://gogreenstaygreen.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/obama.jpg" alt="obama green policy" width="179" height="240" /></a></p>
<p>It was not difficult to rebut the former President and his policies.  Indeed, many might attribute the Democrats’ sweeping victories last November to Bush’s final approval rating, which was worse than any outgoing President in history (22%, CBS/NYT Poll).  Obama chastised the former President’s policies, in no uncertain terms, on the Economy (”Homes have been lost; jobs shed; businesses shuttered”), Civil Liberties (”we [Americans] reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals”), Education (”our schools fail too many”), Foreign Policy (”each day brings further evidence that the way we use energy strengthen our adversaries…”), and the Environment (”…and threaten our planet.”).  He criticized Bush’s leadership (”a sapping of confidence across our land”), and his claim during the 2000 campaign to be a “uniter, not a divider” (”we come to proclaim an end to the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations and worn out dogmas, that for far too long have strangled our politics”).</p>
<p>But what about looking forward?  Obama asked that when future generations look back,</p>
<p>they would be able to say of us, “that we did not turn back nor did we falter; and with eyes fixed on the horizon…we carried forth that great gift of freedom and delivered it safely to future generations.”  And while he acknowledged that the “we can no longer consume the world’s resources without regard to effect”, and that we would “harness the sun, winds, and soils to fuel our cars and run our factories”, he made no specific promises or allusions to how he would juggle the desire to green America’s economy and free us from foreign oil with the more than $10 Trillion deficit and sputtering economy he is inheriting.</p>
<p>Obama has laid out a firm <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/01/15/politics/main4723147.shtml" target="_blank">plan for a stimulus</a>.  Unveiled in congress five days before Mr. Obama took his oath, the stimulus package contains money for quite a few green initiatives:  $32B to update the country’s electrical grid, increasing energy efficiency with ’smart grid’ technologies, $20B in tax incentives for alternative fuels, $10B for mass transit and rail construction (although there is $30B for highway construction), and several billion for updating public buildings to become more energy efficient.  The total stimulus bill?  Currently it stands at $850B over two years.</p>
<p>The stimulus money has two main goals, according to <a href="http://ecopreneurist.com/2009/01/21/reading-between-the-lines-on-obamas-inauguration-speech-what-does-it-mean-for-the-green-economy/#" target="_blank">House</a> Speaker Nancy Pelosi:  “Immediate job creation and continuing job creation.”  The green portion of this stimulus package will help create some of the <a href="http://ecopreneursguide.wordpress.com/2009/01/15/south-korea-plans-to-spend-32m-for-green-job-creation/" target="_blank">green collar economy</a> that we keep hearing about.</p>
<p>But perhaps the more important shift from the era of Bush to the era of Obama is the ongoing policy that we can expect.  Obama has talked openly about the green collar economy, and has been linked with FDR for some of his ideologies that rival New Deal politics, with a ‘green’ twist.  While Obama slipped with many environmentalists by openly talking about “clean coal”, his rhetoric and sentiment alone show that he understands the connections between foreign policy, the environment, the economy and our health.  And rather than dealing with them individually, applying bandages to open wounds, as many would argue the Bush Administration did, Obama has openly acknowledged the need to attack these problems at their root.  Perhaps it is his history as a community organizer, where he was able to get to know ‘the common man’, or maybe it was his upbringing as the son of a mixed race couple, but regardless, he gets it.  He gets that ‘a nation cannot prosper when it favors only the prosperous.’  I believe that rising tide will raise all ships that we on the political left feel will make the world a better place:  green jobs, freedom from foreign oil, a fair system of taxation that does not favor the wealthy, smart growth, and personal responsibility to make the tough choices ahead.  While Bush’s head was firmly in the sand in blissful ignorance on topics of great importance, Mr. Obama signaled with his first speech as President that his eyes are wide open, and that he is ready to lead us forward.</p>
<p><em> Photo credit:  Transplanted Mountaineer, Flickr Creative Commons</em></p>
<hr />Source:<a href="http://ecopreneurist.com/2009/01/21/reading-between-the-lines-on-obamas-inauguration-speech-what-does-it-mean-for-the-green-economy/">ecopreneurist</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/reading-between-lines-obama-inauguration-speech-green-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Old Underwear Factory to Power 10,000 Homes</title>
		<link>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/old-underwear-factory-power-10000-homes/</link>
		<comments>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/old-underwear-factory-power-10000-homes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gogreenstaygreen.com/?p=79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An abandoned Fruit of the Loom factory in Rabun Gap, Ga. is about to get a new life as a biomass facility.  The $21.5 million project will eventually generate 17MW of energy using some of the equipment left behind.
The plant will produce energy from waste from the local forest industry for non-profit Green Power [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gogreenstaygreen.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/fruitloom.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-80" title="fruitloom" src="http://gogreenstaygreen.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/fruitloom.jpg" alt="underwear powerplant" width="468" height="183" /></a>An abandoned Fruit of the Loom factory in Rabun Gap, Ga. is about to get a new life as a <a href="http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/2101/70/">biomass</a> facility.  The $21.5 million project will eventually generate 17MW of energy using some of the equipment left behind.<br />
The plant will produce energy from waste from the local forest industry for non-profit <a href="http://www.greenpoweremc.com/">Green Power EMC</a>, a Georgia-based group of utility companies that focus on renewable energy. The waste will be used in a conventional boiler leftover from the underwear factory, which will generate steam that will power a steam-turbine generator. The electricity generated will then be sold to customers of electricity co-ops.</p>
<p>When the plant is completed in August 2009, it is expected to create 95 jobs and power 10,000 homes. Who would have thought that an abandoned underwear factory could create so much good? This is just another great example of the power of the second &#8220;R&#8221; &#8211; reuse. There are solutions to our energy problems all around us, if we just think creatively enough.</p>
<hr />Source: <a href="http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/2413/">ecogeek</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/old-underwear-factory-power-10000-homes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese Eco-Cities</title>
		<link>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/chinese-eco-cities/</link>
		<comments>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/chinese-eco-cities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gogreenstaygreen.com/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 In 2005, green architect William McDonough and British engineering firm Arup separately announced plans to build ambitious eco-cities housing up to 500,000 inhabitants on the mainland. For a few months following these announcements, coverage was enthusiastic (we have written about these cities a number of times, with earlier articles here and here). Much of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p><a href="http://gogreenstaygreen.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Chinese-eco-cities.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-40" title="Chinese-eco-cities" src="http://gogreenstaygreen.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Chinese-eco-cities.jpg" alt="Chinese Eco-Cities" width="292" height="169" /></a> In 2005, green architect William McDonough and British engineering firm Arup separately announced plans to build ambitious eco-cities housing up to 500,000 inhabitants on the mainland. For a few months following these announcements, coverage was enthusiastic (we have written about these cities a number of times, with earlier articles <a href="http://www.worldchanging.com/archives//004378.html">here</a> and <a href="http://www.worldchanging.com/archives//003596.html">here</a>). Much of this coverage was deserved. Designers are, after all, devising solutions to what promises to be one of the largest rural-to-urban migrations in history.</p>
<p>But in recent months, journalists have begun to look at how these cities are shaping up. After publishing a <a href="http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/9378521/site/newsweek/">glowing article on McDonough&#8217;s designs for sustainable Chinese cities</a> in 2005, Newsweek ran an article this May that reads like <a href="http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/18602545/site/newsweek/">a retraction</a>. Its assessment of Huangbaiyu, the model village in McDonough&#8217;s program and the first in a series of seven planned eco-cities, is bleak:</p>
<blockquote><p>The project appears to be a mess. Construction of the 400 houses is way behind schedule. The 42 that have been built still have no heat, electricity or running water. Walls are already cracking and moisture seeps through the ceilings. According to people who&#8217;ve worked on the project, many of the houses don&#8217;t adhere to the original specifications—meaning they could never achieve the energy savings they were meant to achieve. The biomass gasification facility meant to burn animal, human and agricultural waste, doesn&#8217;t work. Not surprisingly, no one in the village has volunteered to move into the new community.</p></blockquote>
<p>Last month, <a href="http://www.popsci.com/popsci/science/9de4dae055883110vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd.html">Popular Science published a feature</a> that casts similar doubts on the prospects for China&#8217;s eco-cities.</p>
<p>I saw Peter Head speak at April&#8217;s <a href="http://www.holcimfoundation.org/Default.aspx?tabid=155">Holcim Forum</a>, a gathering of sustainability-minded architects and engineers, in Shanghai. During his presentation, he showed a video that had been produced by the Shanghai Industrial Investment Corporation, the developer responsible for Dongtan, the city Arup designed for an island outside of Shanghai. The city presented in the video suggested the myriad gated communities that surround Shanghai: gaudy and dramatic, with very little of the restraint and economy that most would associate with sustainable design.</p>
<p>That is precisely the problem in China. People in developed countries have had a few decades to try out and reject excess. It isn&#8217;t just an awareness of environmental degradation that pushes us to go green; it&#8217;s a knowledge, gleaned from firsthand experience, that conventional living generates a level of waste that makes us uncomfortable. In urban China, however, bigger is still better. Most middle-class Chinese are still preoccupied with finding ways to display their wealth, not minimize its impact on the world.</p>
<p>Such attitudes &#8212; which are understandable, if not admirable &#8212; are behind the problems now surfacing in the transformation of urban China. To accomplish their goals, Western designers working in China might partner with local government officials, as McDonough has done. But such officials might be more concerned with project success than with enforcing land rights or securing public participation &#8212; also critical to creating healthy, enduring communities. On the other hand, another solution is to trust eco-city properties to the market, as Arup has done with Dongtan. Visitors to that project, which is now taking shape, decribe large single-family homes and suburban-style planning. <a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/15.05/feat_popup.html">Wired&#8217;s feature on Dongtan</a> suggests that SIIC and Arup differed on what they wanted out of Dongtan early on:</p>
<blockquote><p>Part of the problem was that SIIC wasn&#8217;t sure yet what it wanted. Its people talked about Dongtan as an eco-city, but they also talked about it as a quaint green suburb or as Shanghai&#8217;s Hamptons, a place for the city&#8217;s wealthy to flee for the weekend. They seemed to have good intentions but little direction.</p></blockquote>
<p>The BBC alludes to similar problems in <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6756289.stm">its recent article on Dongtan</a>.</p>
<p>But the stream of Chinese eco-cities won&#8217;t stop. Last month, New York architect Kevin Kennon announced <a href="http://www.multi-housingnews.com/multihousing/headlines/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003610445">a green community for the resort island of Hainan</a>. We should expect &#8212; and hope &#8212; to see more in years to come. Why? For people interested in seeing China go green (and, given its share of global emissions, we all should be), there isn&#8217;t any other option. The alternative to massive eco-cities is not slow, organic development but massive conventional cities, with all their attendant ills. Urbanization is simply occurring too rapidly in China to allow for anything else. The hope for China now is that is that its designers &#8212; Western architects and local politicians alike &#8212; will learn from their mistakes.</p>
<p>Image: Dongtan Marsh.  Credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/oohoo/140648874/in/photostream/">flickr/laughterwyn</a></p>
<hr />Source: <a href="http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/008674.html">worldchanging.com</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/chinese-eco-cities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Option of Urbanism: Investing in a New American Dream</title>
		<link>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/the-option-of-urbanism-investing-in-a-new-american-dream/</link>
		<comments>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/the-option-of-urbanism-investing-in-a-new-american-dream/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gogreenstaygreen.com/?p=98</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The following is excerpted from Chapter 7, &#8220;Unintended Consequences of Walkable Urbanism&#8221; from The Option of Urbanism: Investing in a New American Dream  , by Christopher Leinberger. Copyright © 2007 by Island Press  . Excerpted by permission of Island Press. All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p><em><a href="about:blank"><a href="http://gogreenstaygreen.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/ChrisLeinbergerHeadshot.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-99" title="ChrisLeinbergerHeadshot" src="http://gogreenstaygreen.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/ChrisLeinbergerHeadshot.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="264" /></a></a>The following is excerpted from Chapter 7, &#8220;Unintended Consequences of Walkable Urbanism&#8221; from </em><a href="http://www.optionofurbanism.com/">The Option of Urbanism: Investing in a New American Dream <span class="external-link"> </span></a>, <em>by Christopher Leinberger. Copyright </em><em>© 2007 by <a href="http://www.islandpress.org/bookstore/details.php?isbn=9781597261364">Island Press <span class="external-link"> </span></a>. Excerpted by permission of Island Press. All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.</em><strong>WHAT TO DO WITH OBSOLETE DRIVABLE SUB-URBAN HOUSING </strong></p>
<p>Arthur C. Nelson of Virginia Tech forecasted that owners of between 1 million (optimistic assumptions) and 22 million (probable) large-lot single-family homes in existence in 2000 will have a hard time finding buyers by 2025, due to changing demographics and development patterns outlined in this book. Yet for now, drivable suburban development continues to be built due to legal codes, subsidies, financial standards, and developer know-how. Hundreds of thousands of McMansions have been built on large drivable sub-urban lots since 2000, and exurban population growth beyond the metropolitan fringe has been growing twice as fast as overall metropolitan growth.8 As a result, the number of obsolete drivable sub-urban housing units on the fringe in 2025 may be even greater than Nelson is projecting. So what will happen with the millions of obsolete houses?</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Learning lessons from our experiences during the 1960s through the 1980s, when the country shifted from walkable urbanism to drivable sub-urban development, there is certainly a high probability that large-lot single-family homes on the fringe might be broken up into apartments or condominiums or sold at bargain-basement prices to lower income families. This is not what homeowner associations, neighborhood groups, municipalities, and school districts on the fringe would want to see, so there would be considerable resistance. There was opposition to &#8220;block busting&#8221; in the 1960s as well, the practice of scaring generally white homeowners with the advice &#8220;sell now before more colored families move into the neighborhood.&#8221; The resistance in the early twenty-first century to this kind of change will probably be even more substantial and well organized, due in part to the politically organized nature of the places where these houses are located. The owners of these fringe houses will take a substantial financial loss, just as those engaging in white flight from the cities did in the 1960s.</p>
<p><a href="about:blank"><img class="left" src="http://www.celsias.com/media/uploads/admin/OptionofUrbanism_comp2_4_19.jpg" border="0" alt="Option of Urbanism" align="left" /></a>But there are other problems with the scenario of large homes being sold to lower income families or broken up into apartments. The first concerns the cost of energy. Let&#8217;s assume that a gasoline-powered vehicle is the probable way to get to this housing in the near and midterm future and that the price of oil will continue to increase faster than inflation, due to both lower production (caused by declining supplies, dislocation due to terrorism, or manipulation by supplier nations) and higher worldwide demand. This will mean that lower income families occupying these then lower cost houses will have large gasoline bills. And the new tenants will have to heat huge houses that are &#8220;outstanding in their fields&#8221;-exposed on all sides to the weather, unlike more efficient apartments and townhouses in more urban settings.</p>
<p>Another problem is that today&#8217;s homes, even high-end McMansions, are cheaply built in comparison to those grand houses and townhouses that were broken up into apartments half a century ago. Hollow doors and wall board are less durable than solid oak doors and lath and plaster walls. Many McMansions have been built with artifi cial components that do not have a proven track record of long life, such as plywood floors using glues that dry out over time and roofs that are built to last no more than ten years. The ultimate proof of the higher quality of the older grand houses and townhouses is that even after being broken up into rental apartments for thirty-sixty years-a very hard use of a property- many of these houses are being reconverted into single-family homes. These restored houses often use the same flooring, walls, doors, banisters, and slate roofs that were installed originally, sometimes 100 years earlier. Current construction standards are much lower, and it is doubtful the recently built houses will survive as long.</p>
<p>The country will be fundamentally restructuring how it constructs the built environment over the next few decades, trying to catch up with the pent-up demand for walkable urbanism. It appears that when the music stops, many families and investors on the fringe will be left without a market-viable seat. This change will become obvious when land prices as a percentage of the selling price for drivable sub-urban housing begin to flatten out and decline while walkable urban land continues to rise as a percentage of the house value. There will be fiscal pain on the metropolitan fringe for municipal and school district budgets, and maybe even bankruptcies, as a result of the pendulum swinging back toward walkable urbanism. Adjustments of this magnitude are never easy.</p>
<hr />Source: <a href="http://www.celsias.com/article/option-urbanism-investing-new-american-dream/">celsias</a> by  Christopher Leinberger July 28, 2008</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gogreenstaygreen.com/news/the-option-of-urbanism-investing-in-a-new-american-dream/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

